Home » Finance Blog You are browsing entries filed in “Finance Blog”

The plight of the sub-99%

Questionable labor standards don’t just plague the makers of your favorite Apple products. There’s still plenty of worker abuse right here on U.S. soil — just look at who picked your market’s winter tomatoes.

By Moshe Silver, Hedgeye

Our economy today is guided by the wisdom of the market, and our private and social lives benefit from a capitalist phantasmagoria of devices that entertain us, educate us, keep us connected with – or distinctly separated from the rest of humanity.

As a result, we suffer from a longstanding cultural blind spot: our society sees nothing below our own exceedingly high visual horizon. The chatter continues over inequality in our society – we read about allegedly grueling working conditions at Apple’s factories in China on devices we can’t put down. George Packer’s article in the most recent Foreign Affairs summarizes a roster of fundamental inequalities – all demonstrably accurate: “Between 1979 and 2006, middle-class Americans saw their annual incomes increase by 21 percent. The poorest American saw their incomes rise by only 11 percent. The top one percent saw their incomes increase by 256 percent.”

Yet, beyond Occupy Wall Street, there is a further substratum below the 99% that the current dialogue does not touch. We bemoan the plight of 14 million permanently unemployed Americans, but below even this structurally disadvantaged group, our society runs on an invisible chassis of human suffering.

Recently Trader Joe’s signed an agreement with a group of Florida tomato fieldworkers that includes labor standards for farm workers, and adds one penny per pound to tomato pickers’ wages, paid by the purchasing companies. Trader Joe’s joins a roster that includes Whole Foods (WFM), McDonald’s (MCD), Burger King, Yum! Brands (YUM), and major food service companies such as Aramark and Sodexo, all of whom have signed a Fair Food Agreement covering their purchases of Florida tomatoes.

The Fair Food Agreement, though it arises from leftist-style agitation and the involvement of NGOs such as Oxfam who are anathema to the right, looks like a triumph of capitalism at its idealized best. It includes, according to the press release, “labor standards developed in unique collaboration among farm workers, tomato growers, and the food industry leaders who purchase Florida tomatoes, with a small price premium to help improve harvesters’ wages.” The premium is the penny per pound of tomatoes. The labor standards include guarantees against abusive treatment and enslavement in the workplace. When end buyers such as Trader Joe’s sign the agreement, it puts the growers on notice that they can no longer rely on, or turn a blind eye to abusive labor practices.

Anti-Slavery International says there are approximately 27 million slaves in the world today. According to the US Department of State, there are about 16,000 new cases of slavery within the United States each year, many the result of humans trafficked illegally from outside our borders, but also a significant number of US citizens. The DOJ estimates that 25% of slaves in the United States today are domestic workers. The Florida tomato fields have long been ground zero for slavery in the American labor force – one Floridan has said if you are eating a Florida winter tomato in the US, it is guaranteed that it was handled by slaves before it reached your grocer’s shelf.

Earlier this month, we spent three days in dusty, dreary Immokalee, FL (sounds like “a broccoli”). Immokalee is not incorporated – it is not a “town,” but a Census-Designated Place (CDP) under the Naples-Marco Island metropolitan area. This means its law enforcement officials are appointed by voters in the wealthy coastal enclaves, whose natural interest lies not in improving the lives of undocumented immigrants, but in keeping them far away from their neighborhoods. Immokalee is the heart of Florida’s tomato-growing country and tens of thousands of migrant workers pass through during tomato season. No one can guess how many of these are slaves.

The 2000 census counted just under 20,000 residents in Immokalee: 71% Hispanic, 18% African American and 3% white. It is estimated that as many as half of undocumented immigrants may not be counted in a census, even if they are permanent residents of a town.

The majority of Immokalee’s Hispanic residents do not speak English – even those who have lived there for more than ten years. Though categorized as “Hispanic,” many are native speakers of indigenous languages, with only rudimentary Spanish. Their days typically start with a 5 AM worker selection at the central parking lot, followed by a bus ride to the tomato field where they sometimes wait for hours until the dew dries. (Tomatoes are finicky fruits and can not be gathered wet.)

The picking runs until dark, followed by a bus ride back. Depending on the location of the fields, the bus ride may be as much as three hours each way. Workers do not get paid for travel time, nor for time spent waiting to the tomatoes to dry in the sun. If it rains, the picking is called off and they do not get paid at all.

Pickers are paid 50 cents per 32-pound bucket of tomatoes. Thus, it costs the grower about $33 in labor per ton of tomatoes. Put another way: in order to earn enough to feed their families, a worker needs to haul two tons of tomatoes every day. If that 50 cents seems a pittance, consider that farmers have to plant, tend, sort, pack and ship their crop, and are at the mercy of the weather. One grower said it costs between $9,500-$11,000 to produce an acre of tomatoes, yielding typically 1,400-1,600 boxes. Returns vary, depending largely on the weather. This grower sells tomatoes as low as $3 a box – taking a 70% loss on the acreage – and sometimes as high as $29, though the highest prices correspond with extreme weather conditions and greatly reduced yields.

Profitability is difficult to pin down. Figures from the University of North Carolina school of agriculture show net revenues for a number of North Carolina tomato growers ranging from $1055.20 per acre, to as low as $140.58. Any way you look at it, this is a narrow margin business. Many things have to go right – weather, competition, demand and quality of a given crop – for a tomato grower to cash in.

The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 provided for unionization and collective bargaining, workplace safety standards and the minimum wage.  And it explicitly excluded agricultural workers and domestic help. Farm workers do not receive benefits or overtime, and children as young as 12 can be put to work. Agricultural operations in the US are also covered by Federal Marketing Orders, which exempt growers from antitrust provisions covering market domination and pricing.

The average tomato picker toils under miserable conditions. Add to that the all too common abuse in the fields, and the routine of tomato picking appears as one of the worst available human activities.

The Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW) was formed in 1992. The following year they discovered workers being held against their will near Immokalee. The group developed evidence which, working through local police, they presented to the DOJ. It took several years, and mounting evidence, but the DOJ finally intervened. Since then, the CIW has been directly responsible for uncovering and developing evidence leading to seven convictions for slavery and trafficking, resulting in the freeing of over one thousand enslaved field workers.

Largely through the CIW’s success at bringing slavery to light, Congress passed the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act in 2000. The original version of the Act provided for incarceration of those who profit while “knowing or having reason to know” that they are benefiting from slave labor. This would have put farmers and end buyers on notice and would have had immediate impact on abusive behavior.

But at the last hour the language was cut. Now, Hispanic criminals who traffic people into the U.S. can be thrown in prison, but the companies who contract with them can walk away and find a new supplier. This leaves a crime that no one has incentive to report – slaves pick tomatoes cheaper than paid workers. The victims are often nearly as badly off once they are freed as while in captivity. They do not speak English, have no local network of friends or family, are physically and psychologically disabled, are not offered social services or medical care, and do not have a valid permit to remain in the U.S.

The CIW do not blame the capitalist system, nor do they blame farmers. All economic and social systems are subject to horrible abuses. The Coalition wants to work within the system America offers them. Far from asking the growers to give them something for nothing, the workers want a safe work environment and the ability to engage in the system themselves. Secretary of State Clinton presented the CIW an award in 2010 for their work against slavery. But their efforts to integrate the Fair Food Program into the consumption chain are moving slowly. One by one, Florida’s growers have signed the Fair Food Agreement, but the program will only work when the end buyers are on board.

The CIW appears to have a straightforward capitalist overview of the entire business that understands how each component contributes, from planting to the dinner table. Their objective is to harmonize the entire chain and ensure their workers’ place within it. We returned from Florida convinced that most Americans who are used to 9-to-5, minimum wage, lunch breaks and vacations, would never put themselves through what the average tomato picker does in the course of a day.

The CIW are an unusual group. For all they have suffered, they do not express anger or seek revenge. They see the big picture of the farming industry and know how well it can treat them – if only it stops abusing them. They want what everyone else comes to America for: a chance to earn their fair share in return for hard work, not to be given it for nothing.

Take a good look next time you eat a tomato.  It represents struggle and suffering.  Will it also come to represent the best our society has to offer?


Filed under: Contributors

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Bond downgrades may hurt Wall Street more than some think

Why it's time to break up the 'too big to fail' banks

Moody’s says banks are less credit worthy

Changes in bond ratings may make it more costly for banks to do business and could halt the rally in their shares.

There seems to be little that can stop the bank stock rally.

Last week, when Moody’s said it was considering downgrading by as much as three notches the bond ratings of the U.S.’s largest financial firms the market basically shrugged. Shares of Bank of America (BAC), Citigroup (C), Goldman Sachs (GS) and other financial firms actually rose on the day of the news. So there.

But some analysts think the debt downgrades if they occur could end up being a significant blow to the bank’s Wall Street businesses. Analyst Brad Hintz of Sanford Bernstein says he is likely to lower his earnings numbers for all the banks, though he’s not sure how much yet.

Ratings actually don’t matter that much when it comes to things like mergers and acquisitions; stock and bond underwriting; asset management and brokerage services. Those businesses don’t typically require a lot of borrowing. But in the run-up to the financial crisis, Wall Street got into a lot of borrowing-intensive businesses. Dodd-Frank has forced the banks out of some of those businesses – proprietary trading to an extent – but not all of them. In fact, what the potential ratings downgrade points out is that Wall Street has mostly been loath to exit these businesses, and relatively low-interest rates have made that possible, along with checking accounts, on which banks pay almost nothing for access to our money.

(MORE: John Paulson misses on bank stocks, again)

JP Morgan Chase (JPM), for one, maintains an enormous book of derivatives, which are contracts that allow people to hedge and bet on price swings in commodities, interest rates and other areas. It gets more costly to write those contracts if you have a lower credit score. For all the banks, derivatives can make up as much as 15% of their profits from fixed income capital markets, and 20% of equity capital markets. So that’s the part of the business that will be shrinking. Also, making markets in illiquid securities, like sub-prime mortgage bonds, for which there seems to be an increased interest, or small-cap stocks, becomes more expensive to do because you have to borrow money to hold on to those securities.

What’s more, the ratings changes could also shake up who does what on Wall Street. And we may already be seeing that. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan are likely to see less of a ratings cut than Morgan Stanley (MS), Bank of America and Citigroup. That will put pressure on market making and derivatives parts of the later, and drive more of that business to Goldman and JP Morgan. Hintz says the capital market business of Morgan Stanley and Bank of America, which is the former Merrill Lynch, have already been struggling. But the fact that Morgan Stanley recently nabbed the top slot on the Facebook IPO could just be another sign of how Wall Street’s businesses will shake out.

David Hendler who follows the banks for CreditSights says the Moody’s downgrades are less of an event than Hintz and others think. Banks have known the downgrades are coming and are prepared for it. What’s more, he says bond investors care less about ratings than they used to and will continue to buy up bank debt. But recently, the value of bank bonds have been falling even as the shares of financial firms have continued to rise. That’s a concern. Bond investors are typically a more cautious bunch than stock market investors. And being cautious on the banks in the past few years has generally paid off. We’ll see if that has changed.

Filed under: Term Sheet

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Failing gracefully

Sometimes, despite our best efforts, things just don’t work out.

By Marc Randolph, contributor

Since the first of the year, two of the companies I’ve been involved with have decided to wrap things up. In both cases, two young CEOs had developed strong ideas, tirelessly pitched their concepts, raised significant amounts of money, recruited first-class teams, launched and pivoted two or three times, only to ultimately find out that their carefully nurtured idea was not such a great idea after all.

But what I found most impressive was that both of these CEOs managed to come to this decision while they still had ample amounts of money in the bank. Therefore they had time to wind down their companies gracefully, while there was still time to create a reasonable outcome for their employees, investors and customers.

It made me realize that while we all seem to chatter endlessly about what it takes to build a company, we almost never talk about what’s involved in taking one down.

Part of that is because entrepreneurs are relentlessly optimistic – a necessary trait for overcoming the years of adversity and naysaying that accompanies getting a startup off the ground – so it certainly cuts against the grain for any of us to say “enough.”

Perhaps like a test pilot, we’re hesitant to acknowledge failure or even the slightest lack of confidence in our abilities, perhaps scared that others will think that we are somehow lesser as entrepreneurs. And maybe we’ve been overly influenced by survivor bias, since we mostly hear about the one company that completed their hail-Mary catch, rather than the 10 companies that choose to drive full speed ahead until the very moment they ran out of gas.

Despite my desire to back CEOs who are going to be bulldogs about pursuing every last lead and chasing down every last pivot, I also have to respect a leader who not only has the smarts to recognize when he is going down a dead end road, but also the discipline to be just as aggressive about engineering a safe landing for all of his stakeholders.

There’s more than just reputation at stake when you leave yourself options. You get to . . .

  • Sell a living company: In many ways a start-up is like a shark — if it’s not moving forward, it dies. So while your company may not be growing fast enough to remain viable as a stand alone, starting your wind-down early lets you keep the doors open while you consider your other options. It allows you to keep your existing customers happy, allows you to keep your current team together, and allows you to show potential acquirers a more accurate picture of exactly what they are getting.
  • Sell your technology, not just your team: In the late ’90s two of the smartest guys I know built an incredible tool that did auction pricing arbitrage. When they failed to get follow-on funding and closed up shop, the team landed on their feet. But the technology?  Last I heard it was on a hard drive in the founder’s attic.  There’s no question that technology acquisitions usually require longer and more extensive due-diligence than pure talent acquisitions, so leaving yourself time for suitors to adequately appraise you, makes it more likely that the fruits of all your efforts will eventually see the light of day.
  • Be more aggressive about your price: Nothing undermines your negotiating power like desperation.  Having money in the bank allows you to say no, which dramatically strengthens your hand.
  • Look after your own reputation: Sure, nothing will cement your reputation in the valley like success.  But it’s still possible to get points for the manner in which you’ve managed all those alternate scenarios.

Maybe you didn’t generate the 10X return your investors were hoping for, but fighting to at least return their original investment is still a materially better outcome than a complete wash out.

Maybe you didn’t get your employees the payday that sets them up for life, but at least you landed them in a promising new opportunity as well as getting them “a little something extra” that made their last 18 months of hard work well worth it.

And for you, while you may not have ended up as “the next Zuck” like you had always dreamed, you still did the very best you could under the circumstances. Your employees will know it. Your investors will know it. And most important of all, you’ll know it.

Marc Randolph (@mbrandolph) is a veteran Silicon Valley entrepreneur, high tech executive and startup consultant. Most recently Marc was co-founder of the online movie and television streaming service Netflix, serving as their first CEO. He blogs at www.marc randolph.com 

Filed under: Contributors, From the Crowd

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

The week in IPOs

The following three companies are expected to price IPOs this week:

Bazaarvoice Inc., an Austin, Texas-based provider of hosted social commerce solutions, plans to offer around 9.48 million common shares at between $8 and $10 per share. It would have an initial market cap of approximately $512 million, were it to price in the middle of its range. The company plans to trade on the Nasdaq under ticker symbol BV, with Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Bank Securities and Credit Suisse serving as co-lead underwriters. Shareholders include Austin Ventures (34.1 pre-IPO stake), Barry Ventures (14.3%), Eastern Advisors (10.6) and First Round Capital. It reports an $18 million net loss for the nine months ending January 31, 2012, on around $74 million in revenue. www.bazaarvoice.com

Ceres Inc., a Thousand Oaks, Calif.-based seller of seeds to produce renewable biomass feedstocks, plans to offer five million common shares at between $21 and $23 per share. It plans trade on the Nasdaq under ticker symbol CERE, while Goldman Sachs and Barclays Capital are serving as co-lead underwriters. The company reports at $36 million net loss for the 12 months ending August 31, 2011, on around $6.6 million in revenue. Shareholders include Warburg Pincus (15.56% pre-IPO stake), Oxford Bioscience Partners (10.65%), Oppenheimer Growth (8.46%) and Monsanto Co. (6.41%). www.ceres.net

Proto Labs Inc., a Maple Plain, Minn.-based maker of custom parts for prototyping and short-run production, plans to offer 4.3 million shares at between $13 and $15 per share. The company would have an initial market cap of approximately $325 million, were it to price in the middle of its range. It plans to trade on the NYSE under ticker symbol PRLB, with Jefferies and Piper Jaffray serving as co-lead underwriters. North Bridge Growth Equity holds a 31.7% pre-IPO stake. It reports $18 million in net income for 2011 on around $99 million in revenue. www.protolabs.com

Get Dan’s daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

Filed under: Term Sheet

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Fortune on TV: Benner talks Blankfein

My Fortune colleague Katie Benner was on CNBC’s Squawk Box program earlier this morning, discussing how Lloyd Blankfein may step down as CEO of Goldman Sachs (GS) by the end of this summer. Here’s the vid:

Filed under: Term Sheet

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Eric Leathers joins TPG

Private equity investor Eric Leathers has quietly joined TPG Capital, Fortune has learned.

Leathers previously was with Pine Brook Partners, where he spent more than two years as a managing director focused on financial services companies. At last check, he sat on the boards of Pine Brook portfolio companies Aurigen Capital Ltd., Green Bancorp Inc., and Narragansett Bay Insurance Co.

Prior to joining Pine Brook, Leathers was a partner for more than a decade at Capital Z Partners. Before that, he was an investment banker with DLJ.

I’ve left a message for Leathers at TPG’s New York office, and will update this post if he responds.

Get Dan’s daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

Filed under: Private Equity Deals, Term Sheet

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Exclusive: NextView Ventures raises first fund

Boston-based micro-VC firm has cash in the bank.

Regular readers know that I’m far more bullish on the Boston-area startup scene than is your average blogging bear. Part of it is surely hometown booster-ism, which (hopefully) gets balanced out by my physical presence outside of the Silicon Valley and New York City echo chambers. Plus, I actually bother to read the data.

What Boston continues to lack, however, are micro-VC firms. We’ve got plenty of established venture firms and a burgeoning angel phenomenon, but few new institutional groups focused exclusively on seed-stage companies.

One of the exceptions has been NextView Ventures, formed in mid-2010 by Dave Beisel (ex-Venrock), Rob Go (ex-Spark Capital) and Lee Hower (ex-Point Judith Capital/LinkedIn). It invests along the entire East Coast – plus opportunistically in Silicon Valley – but is based just a stone’s throw away from Boston’s South Station.

And now NextView has formally closed its debut fund, with $21 million in capital commitments (sorry for burying the lead). Expect it to invest between $250k-$500k in tech companies that are raising institutional seed rounds. A little more than half of its investments will be consumer-facing, while the remainder will be B2B. “We’re not going too deep down the infrastructure stack,” Hower says.

It already has 16 portfolio companies – mostly smaller deals funded from partner capital – with plans to add another 15 or 20.

I asked Rob Go about what surprised him, if anything, about the fundraising process. His reply: “I hadn’t realized how much the LP universe charts out the future, in terms of how LPs have already broken out allocations based on what’s in market or coming back to market. I’m not exactly saying that new funds should try timing the market, but it certainly pays to be aware of who else is raising capital.”

Update: Lee Hower has put up a blog post about the fundraise.

Get Dan’s daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

Filed under: Term Sheet, Venture Capital Deals

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

M&A

Aptuit has sold its clinical trials supply business to Catalent Pharma Solutions for an undisclosed amount. Aptuit is a portfolio company of Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe, while Catalent backers include The Blackstone Group, Genstar Capital, Perseus, Cheyenne Capital and Aisling Capital. www.aptuit.com

Acorda Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq: ACOR) has agreed to acquire Neuronex Inc., a developer of a nasal spray formulation of diazepam for certain epilepsy patients. The deal could be worth up to $133 million. www.accorda.com

Fab.com, a New York-based flash sales site, has acquired German flash sales site Casacanda. No financial terms were disclosed, but TechCrunch puts the sale price at $11 million. Fab.com recently raised $40 million in Series B funding from Andreessen Horowitz, Menlo Ventures, First Round Capital, Baroda Ventures, SoftTech VC and A-Grade Investments. www.fab.com

Fortis Inc. (TSX: FTS) has agreed to acquire CH Energy Group Inc. (NYSE: CHG) for approximately $1 billion in cash (plus $500 million in assumed debt). The $65 per share offer represents a 65% premium to Friday’s closing price for CH Energy stock.

Fung Brands has agreed to acquire an 80% stake in French fashion house Sonia Rykiel. No financial terms were disclosed. The Rykiel family will retain the other 20%.

TNT Express NV, a Dutch shipping company, has rejected a $6.4 billion takeover offer from United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS). TNT did say, however, that talks would continue between the two companies. www.tnt.com

URS Corp. (NYSE: URS) has agreed to acquire Canadian oilfield services company Flint Energy Services (TSX: FES) for C$1.25 billion in cash. URS also will assume approximately C$225 million in Flint debt. www.urscorp.com

Sentinel Capital Partners has sold Inscape Publishing, a Minneapolis-based provider of assessment and training products that develop interpersonal skills, to John Wiley & Sons Inc. No financial terms were disclosed. www.inscapepublishing.com

Want deal news in your inbox each morning? Then get Term Sheet!

Filed under: Term Sheet

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Private equity deals

Addax & Oryx Group, a Swiss energy company, is in talks to sell its African downstream operations to private equity firm Emerging Capital Partners. www.addax-oryx.com

Advanced Sleep Medicine Services Inc., a portfolio company of High Road Capital Partners, has acquired Pacific Sleep Medicine Services, a provider of sleep disorder diagnostic services with laboratory facilities throughout Southern California. No financial terms were disclosed. www.highroadcap.com

Centre Lane Partners has acquired Louisville Laminating from Reynolds Packaging Group LLC. No financial terms were disclosed. Louisville Laminating provides metals-based packaging and laminated materials to the tobacco, wire and cable and building and construction markets. www.centrelanepartners.com

E-Verifile.com, an Atlanta-based provider of risk assessment, administrative support and workforce solutions, has been acquired by an investor consortium that includes Frontier Capital, The Yucaipa Companies, Magic Johnson Enterprises, Plexus Capital and Mark Wilson (founder of Ryla). No financial terms were disclosed. www.e-verifile.com

Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. and TPG Capital are among those circling Chinese software and IT services provider AsiaInfo-Linkage Inc. (Nasdaq: ASIA), according to Reuters. Bids could be worth more than $1 billion.

MW Industries, a Logansport, Ind.-based maker of specialty springs and fasteners, has acquired Pontotoc Spring, a Pontotoc Miss.-based manufacturer of aftermarket coil springs, from Union Spring & Manufacturing Corp. No financial terms were disclosed. MW Industries is a portfolio company of Genstar Capital. www.mw-ind.com

Vista Equity Partners has approached British financial software company Misys (LSE: SETS) about an all-cash buyout. Misys currently is in talks to merge with Switzerland’s Temenos. www.misys.com

Wynnchurch Capital has acquired an undisclosed stake in NSC Minerals Ltd., a Saskatchewan-based producer and distributor of salt for highway de-icing, industrial, energy, construction, consumer and agricultural applications. No financial terms were disclosed for the deal, which was completed last December. www.wynnchurch.com

Want deal news in your inbox each morning? Then get Term Sheet!

Filed under: Private Equity Deals, Term Sheet

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Venture capital deals

Fluid Inc., a San Francisco-based provider of SaaS-based merchandising solutions for ecommerce, has raised $24 million in growth equity funding from an affiliate of Goldman Sachs Asset Management. www.fluid.com

Black Sand Technologies Inc., an Austin, Texas-based chipmaker specializing in power amplifier technology for wireless applications, has raised $10 million in Series C funding. Return backers include Northbridge Venture Partners and Austin Ventures. www.blacksand.com

Compass Labs, a San Jose, Calif.-based social media advertising platform, has raised $6 million in new VC funding from New Enterprise Associates and Presidio Ventures. www.compasslabs.com

Tracx, a New York-based social media management platform, has raised $4.4 million in Series B funding co-led by Revel Partners and Flybridge Capital Partners. www.tracx.com

Want deal news in your inbox each morning? Then get Term Sheet!

Filed under: Term Sheet, Venture Capital Deals

February 22 2012 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »