Home » July, 2011 Entries posted on “July, 2011”

How Apple is sucking the profit out of the mobile phone market

The iPhone last quarter took in 5.6% of unit sales and 66.3% of the profit

Q2 2011. Click to enlarge. Source: Asmyco

Some readers complained when we ran a similar headline almost a year ago, accompanied by the bottom chart at right.

At the time, Apple (AAPL) had a 3% share of the global mobile phone market but was taking 39% of the profit — a situation that didn’t seem to bode well for its competitors.

Q2 2010. Source: Asymco

Since then, the imbalance has only grown worse. By the first quarter of 2011, according to Asymco’s Horace Dediu, Apple unit share had grown to 5% and its profit share to 55%. (See here.)

On Friday, Dediu updated his graphic with data for calendar Q2 from the eight largest mobile manufacturers. As the top chart shows, Apple is now raking off nearly two thirds of all the profit in the mobile phone business with what is, according to IDC, only 5.6% of unit sales. Note that we’re talking about all cell phones all over the world, not just smartphones and not just in the U.S.

This can’t be much fun for anybody else trying to make money in this market. Dediu notes that four of the eight manufacturers he tracks – Nokia (NOK), Motorola (MOT), Sony-Ericsson and LG — actually lost money last quarter.  Samsung took 15% of the profits, down from 21% two years ago despite smartphone sales that were up 520% year over year, according to Strategy Analytics. Research in Motion (RIMM) was at 11%, basically unchanged. And HTC, the most nimble of the manufacturers building phones using Google (GOOG) Android OS, grew to 7.4%, up from 6% last quarter.

For more of Dediu’s analysis — and more charts and graphs — visit Asymco here.


Filed under: Apple 2.0

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 30 2011 | Posted in Tech Blog | Read More »

Betterworks’ Bootcamp: Sell Or Leave

Watch More Videos from:
forbes at

July 30 2011 | Posted in Market Update | Read More »

29 July 2011 Swift Energy rings the NYSE Closing Bell

Watch More Videos from:
nysetv1 at

July 30 2011 | Posted in NYSE | Read More »

Pity the federal worker. Washington won’t.

Think the latest GDP numbers are bad? Just wait until the stiffs who punch the clock for Uncle Sam have their paychecks in limbo if no resolution on the debt ceiling is reached.

By Tory Newmyer, writer

FORTUNE – The austerity consensus among policymakers in the debt ceiling debate has ensured that the federal workforce will face cuts — just how much is still unknown. And as soon as next week, government employees could be asked to report for work with no certainty about when they’ll actually receive their next paychecks.

That’s because if lawmakers can’t agree on a plan to extend the federal government’s borrowing authority by Tuesday, the Treasury Department will start running short on the cash it needs to pay the nation’s bills. And it will begin prioritizing payments, with interest on the debt likely at the top of that list.

What comes next isn’t clear — Treasury so far hasn’t tipped its hand on its contingency plan — but it’s a relatively safe bet that checks to rank-and-file workers will place behind benefits owed through Social Security, Medicare, and other social safety net programs, pay to military personnel and vets, and education assistance as millions of kids get ready to ship off for college.

This isn’t the furlough federal employees were facing this spring, when the partisan fight over spending almost led to a government shutdown. In that case, workers would have been sent home without pay, because the federal government lost its legal authority to incur new obligations. In this case, workers can still work; they just won’t know when the feds will once again have the money to pay them.

That will be bad news not just for federal workers, but the rest of us, too, because it will mean the $14.2 billion in salaries and benefits those employees are set to collect in August could be taken out of the economy. The figure comes from a report by the Bipartisan Policy Center that found the government will run a $130 billion deficit in August, forcing it to cut payments dramatically in a potential gut-blow to our our shaky recovery.

“There will be a substantial effect on 3rd quarter GDP,” the center’s Jay Powell says. “And the issue is, is it a tipping point for the economy? Because it’s obviously slowed down dramatically here, and you give it another kick, do you dip back into recession? Who knows. It’s not going to help.”

Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents 150,000 federal employees across 31 departments and agencies, says she has no answers about what a failure to raise the debt limit will mean for her members next month. But against the looming threat, her group is punching back against longer-term plans to reduce the deficit on the backs of federal workers. The union has launched a lobbying campaign to pressure lawmakers to back off, in part by trying to highlight “the direct connection between the work of federal employees and the quality of life in the country.”

Public service ads featuring workers describing the services they provide are running on television and radio in major markets across the country, and Kelley is urging her members to follow up by leaning on their elected reps. While the workforce is heavily concentrated in the D.C.-metro area, Kelley says she has thousands of members across the country – ”anywhere there’s an IRS service center, we have four to eight thousand,” like in Utah, a Tea Party stronghold.

And while the foot soldiers of a small-government movement named for a tax protest aren’t likely to see eye-to-eye with tax collectors, there is an odd convergence in their agendas. Kelley is hoping Tea Party-backed deficit hawks in Congress will appreciate that boosting the IRS budget, for example, will actually yield revenue, through tougher enforcement. The official budget scorekeepers affirmed as much this week, estimating that a $13 billion bump in spending on the IRS over the next decade will yield $42 billion in new tax collections.

But if Washington can’t remember how to love the federal workforce, the employees can take some qualified solace in this: They’re still okay by everyone else. Michael Dimock, a researcher with the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, says recent polling presents a mixed picture of attitudes toward the public sector, with two-thirds support for trimming the federal payroll by 10% over the next decade.

“But they do also empathize with government workers needing to pay their bills,” he says. “There are signs that people are very sympathetic to understanding, hey, we all have jobs, and not getting paid is not very nice.”


Filed under: Contributors, Term Sheet

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 29 2011 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Nothing but a Congressional comb-over

Even when a compromise is reached, the current bills proposed to lower the deficit are merely covering up long-term budget deficit issues that will need to be addressed again in the next 12 to 18 months.

By Daryl G. Jones, Hedgeye

Discussion of the debt ceiling debate has become the one of the most overhyped factors in global markets and it is a little depressing to analyze the political shenanigans going on in Washington. Nonetheless, I feel compelled to comment.

Speaker Boehner is having serious issues garnering votes for his debt and deficit plan. The vote was scheduled yesterday and is now postponed. It seems the Tea Party is not on his political side, despite fear mongering from the White House that Christmas will be ruined if a long term debt deal is not passed in short order.  I can’t say I agree with the Tea Party on everything, but I will give them credit for a conviction of their beliefs.

The debt limit deadline is August 2nd, which is now four days away. Between now and then, how this plays out is really anyone’s guess. It seems likely the Tea Party will acquiesce and a deal gets passed in the House, although as we saw yesterday evening, even that is uncertain. If that does occur, Senate Majority Leader Reid and President Obama have been adamant that they will not support any bill that has a two-step process and that doesn’t extend the debt ceiling past the 2012 election.

Regardless of the two-step process in the Boehner bill, the Boehner and Reid bills have dramatic differences regardless. At face value they are talking about similar numbers — the Boehner plan, in total, is looking for more than $2.7 trillion in cuts, while the Reid plan is proposing almost $2.2 trillion in deficit cuts. While those numbers are in the same area code, the methodology for getting to the cuts is dramatically different.

The Reid plan only has $710 billion in real budget cuts — the remainder of the deficit reduction plan comes from the winding down of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Setting aside the differences in process, that leaves us with a $2 trillion difference in the nature of deficit cuts between the parties. That’s one mother of a compromise for four days.

Stepping back to the longer term, we need to keep in mind that both of the current bills proposed are really nothing more than Congressional comb-overs. As a refresher, Merriam Webster describes a comb-over as follows:

“An arrangement of hair on a balding man in which hair from the side of the head is combed over the bald spot.”

As a man who sports a comb-over, I can vouch that is an apt description.  The sneaky thing about a comb-over is that while you can comb your hair over, the rest of the world can usually tell that there is a bald spot lingering beneath.

In the chart of the day, I’ve shown what I mean graphically by comparing proposed Reid plan discretionary spending cuts as a percentage of the estimated deficit. Similar to many a bad business plan, the Reid plan is very back-end loaded (by the way, so is the Boehner plan). In fiscal 2012, the discretionary spending cuts as proposed by Reid ramp from 2.2% of the CBO’s projected deficit to 14.0% of the CBO’s projected deficit by 2020.

The other key assumption to keep in context when considering the currently proposed Congressional comb-overs are the GDP growth assumptions proposed by CBO. In the projection period used in my analysis in the attached chart, the federal government budget years from 2012 to 2020 at an average real GDP growth rate of 2.9% per year. This compares to the actual real GDP growth rate over the last ten years of 1.7%. Obviously, future deficits will be much higher if growth in the next decades tracks similar to the last decade.

While the political drama in Washington has been entertaining over the last few months, we need to keep in mind that even when the compromise is reached, the current bills proposed are merely covering up long term budget deficit issues that will again need to be addressed in the next 12 – 18 months.  Therefore any short term positive stock market reaction should be taken with a grain of salt in the context of continued long term issues.


Filed under: Contributors, Term Sheet

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 29 2011 | Posted in Finance Blog | Read More »

Groupon responds to LivingSocial swipe

Groupon CEO Andrew Mason

FORTUNE — At Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference, LivingSocial CEO Tim O’Shaughnessy had some choice words for Groupon in which he accused the daily deals competitor of copying several of his company’s recent efforts, including LivingSocial Instant, a service offering near-real-time deals that may only last one or two hours.

We ran an edited version of his comments earlier this week.

“So we launched LivingSocial Instant, and Groupon launched their clone of that later [Groupon Now],” O’Shaughnessy said. “We launched LivingSocial Escapes; they just launched Getaways, their clone of that, following that. … We launched LivingSocial Instant and we launched LivingSocial Escapes, and they’ve since launched — subsequently launched  competing products.”

Readers chimed in with their own thoughts afterwards (one Twitter user: “Pot, kettle?”), and O’Shaughnessy’s comments caught the eye of Groupon itself.

“Focusing only on the instant deals and travel features ignores a long list of innovations in which Groupon has led the industry, including various partnerships and other projects,” a Groupon spokesperson told us.

To boot, Fortune was pointed to several Groupon-exclusive partnerships with Live Nation, Yahoo, and Ebay as well as several daily deal “firsts” initiated by company, including the industry’s first ever national deal (with Gap) last August,  ”deal personalization” — user targeting based on gender, zip code, and purchase history — and advertising of merchant deals via banners, ad copy and landing pages.

The escalating competition comes during a particularly heated moment for both daily deals sites. Groupon recently filed for an IPO and is under scrutiny from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)  for using an unusual measure in its S-1 filing, “adjusted consolidated segment operating income” (or adjusted CSOI), to measure profits without including its online marketing expenses. Meanwhile, LivingSocial just reportedly picked a team of underwriters for its own public offering.


Filed under: Uncategorized

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 29 2011 | Posted in Tech Blog | Read More »

Are data restrictions actually a sham?

ISPs argue they can’t keep up with consumer demand — and have to implement caps to cope. Not true says one pundit.

FORTUNE — The argument by Internet service providers (ISPs) that too many people are using too much bandwidth seems plausible enough. After all, streaming high-definition movies, posting high-megapixel photos and downloading video games are making ever-larger demands on networks. But does that mean ISPs are really running out of bandwidth? Is capping individual usage the only way they can cope?

No, says tech pundit Robert X. Cringely (a.k.a. Mark Stephens). He argues that data caps are a ploy by ISPs to position themselves to increase their profits as data consumption explodes in the coming years.

The ISPs’ motivation aside, Cringely counters the their claims on the basics of bandwidth economics. Bandwidth usage is certainly increasing, but at the same time “backbone costs [basically, what ISPs pay to hook themselves into the Internet] are going down and have been doing so for many years,” he writes. In Tokyo, he says, the ISP Softbank BB charges its customers about half of what American ISPs charge, even while offering speeds four times faster. “Yet Softbank BB is profitable. Their backbone costs are inconsequential and to argue otherwise is probably a lie.”

Still, given the capacity in place now, it’s a problem when particular users go way past the norm in bandwidth consumption, as when Comcast (CMCSA) recently booted a Seattle man from its network (and, not surprisingly, treated him shabbily in the process) because he went way past the 250-gigabyte monthly limit.

Here is where Cringely gets into informed speculation as to the real motives of ISPs for setting caps. “Data caps that may make logical sense today make no sense tomorrow,” he writes, “yet once they are in place they’ll tend to stay in place.” And eventually, “we will all bump into these caps and our Internet bills will suddenly double as a result, circumventing competition and ending a 15-year downward broadband price trend.”


Filed under: Uncategorized

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 29 2011 | Posted in Tech Blog | Read More »

Jeffrey Katzenberg: Why movies “suck” now

DreamWorks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg didn’t mince words on the state of Hollywood. Plus, he told us which Pixar film was a “bad idea.”

DreamWorks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg. Photo: Kevin Moloney/Fortune Brainstorm TECH

FORTUNE — With summer in full swing and popcorn flicks like Captain America and Harry Potter opening with robust ticket sales, you’d think Hollywood execs would be beaming. But DreamWorks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg has some beef with his industry. According to Katzenberg, audiences are flocking to theaters, but the quality of the movies are “unbelievably bad.”  

Katzenberg appeared at Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference last week in Aspen, Colo., where he offered the attendees some frank insight. Here’s an edited portion of his comments: 

Today the thing that is probably most askew in Hollywood is the issue of marketability versus playability, and what that really means is that there is this sort of unholy alliance that has existed forever between art and commerce, show and biz. Today, it’s out of balance, and it’s too much on the biz, too much on the commerce, too much on the marketability. … The last seven or eight months of movies is the worst lineup of movies you’ve experienced in the last five years of your life. They suck. It’s unbelievable how bad movies have been.

There is an ebb and flow that comes on, and there is an action and there’s a reaction to it, and yes, they will change and there will be an adjustment that will get made to that.  It’s a very entrepreneurial world, and I think you will see that right itself with time. But, right now — today — it’s a particularly dreary moment.

We’re always looking for a great idea, a great story.  You know, people often ask, how do you know if something is a great story, and unfortunately, I think it’s more art than science to that. I do know that there are some things that just catch people’s interest and it doesn’t matter — it works anywhere anyplace in the world.

I have to say every time I ever said the words “Kung Fu Panda” wherever I was in the world, somebody would smile and say, “What’s that about?”  That to me is a good idea. It’s not a story, but at least it’s something that is going to intrigue people, and it’s a place to get started.

You can have a good idea and bad execution and have a success.  I only know of one time that I can think of in the field of animation where somebody had a bad idea and had perfect execution and the movie was breathtaking: Ratatouille.

I assure you this is a bad idea. Let’s have a semi-realistic rat in a kitchen cooking shit to eat. No one in their right mind is going to say, “Well, that’s a good idea.” It’s a bad idea, but it’s so beautiful in its execution and such a great piece of storytelling. And actually, I think it’s one of the great pieces of animation of our time.

For a full transcript of the conversation, please click here.


Filed under: Brainstorm Conference

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 29 2011 | Posted in Tech Blog | Read More »

ARM wants to wrestle with Intel

ARM is gunning for Intel by trying to break open the old-line PC and server markets. Meanwhile, Intel is charging ahead with new mobile offerings.

FORTUNE — Crack open your smartphone, and chances are there’s ARM—not Intel—inside. The British chip designer commands the mobile market. Last quarter alone, 1.1 billion of its power-efficient microprocessors were shipped in phones and tablets. But Cambridge-based ARM Holdings (ARMH) has bigger ambitions. In recent months, it has been talking up plans to get its chip designs into PCs and servers as well.

Meanwhile, Intel’s (INTC) been ramping up its efforts at penetrating the fast-growing mobile market. The world’s largest chipmaker owns the PC and server markets, but has failed to get its processors into smaller mobile devices. Recently, though, Intel scored several (albeit small) tablet wins. And it has said a phone powered by its Medfield processor will be unveiled by end of this year.

The two companies have long been on a collision course, but their battle for each other’s territory is about to heat up. By next year, Intel-running tablets and phones will have finally hit the market and ARM-based processors will have made their way into notebook computers (like those running Microsoft’s (MSFT) upcoming Windows 8). That will leave Intel breaking into a hot new sector just as ARM begins cracking open an old-line market.Of course, neither company is going to have an easy time taking on the other’s monopoly.

Intel has struggled to get a low-power processor into smartphones and tablets, but ARM executives are the first to admit they are worried about the encroaching competition. ”You never discount Intel,” says Ian Drew, executive VP of marketing at ARM and a 14-year Intel veteran. “I’ve worked there long enough to know that they are a supreme manufacturing company.”

In addition to superior manufacturing capabilities, Intel’s size—whether measured in manpower or revenues—dwarfs ARM’s. Then again, ARM’s business model doesn’t require building multi-billion-dollar fabs. Unlike Intel, ARM doesn’t actually manufacture chips. Instead, it licenses its technology to companies like Qualcomm (QCOM), Texas Instruments (TXN) and Nvidia (NVDA) and collects royalties on every device shipped with its architecture.

“ARM has great architecture and a lot of momentum behind them and Intel has superior manufacturing,” says UBS analyst Uche Orji. “Calling this one will be tough—the answer to this riddle won’t be clear until at least four to five years.”

In the meantime, predictions of who will grab what portion of market share are running rampant. Research firm IHS iSuppli recently said it projects that by 2015, 22.9% of notebook shipments worldwide will be ARM-based systems.

In the long run, the rivalry could be good news for consumer electronics manufacturers—and possibly even for consumers. Why? Because increasing competition among chip suppliers could eventually drive down prices. But it’s not clear either company will end up “winning” this match.

“I think they will both be successful to a limited extent,” says UBS’s Orji. “I expect to see some ARM PCs next year, and I also expect to see some Intel handsets in the market next year.”


Filed under: Big Tech, Uncategorized

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 29 2011 | Posted in Tech Blog | Read More »

Startup Idols one year later: Modumetal

The transformative metal startup is thinking bigger these days. Much bigger. 

By Eli Epstein, contributor

Modumetal CEO Christina Lomasney. Photo: Modumetal

FORTUNE — With numerous venture capital awards and an impending joint venture with Steel Dynamics (STLD) under its belt, Modumetal has kept the snags to a minimum since it competed in last year’s Startup Idol competition at Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference.

The five-year-old Seattle-based startup is making its name with a unique scientific approach that quite literally redesigns metal, dissolving various existing pieces in acid, adding electrical charges to the mixture, and creating what it calls “nanolaminates,” extremely durable and light metal composites that have the strength of structural steel and the density of aluminum. They’re also fairly inexpensive to produce, and they eliminate hefty steel production costs and improve fuel efficiency in cars and jetliners by reducing the weight of structural parts.

“We believe our vision will have a dramatic effect on the adoption of nanomaterials,” says Modumetal CEO Christina Lomasney, a Boeing (BA) alum who co-founded the company with John Whitaker in 2006. “We’re attempting to raise the bar and recognize that nanomaterials have capabilities that far outperform conventional materials.”

Since pitching at last year’s Brainstorm Tech, Lomasney has been raising awareness and promoting the benefits of nanolaminates across all industries. A joint venture with U.S. carbon steel giant Steel Dynamics is also in the works, and while Lomasney would not discuss the partnership in detail, she did say that Modumetal is currently closing its Series B round of funding and that Steel Dynamics would be an investor. The company previously announced that it would contribute its coating system to Steel Dynamics’s own steel, one of Modumetal’s first large “scale-up” operations.

Earlier on, Modumetal dealt heavily in government contracts and commercial partnerships that produced propulsion and land vehicle parts for the U.S. Defense Logistics Agency and nanolaminated plane part coatings for Naval Air Systems Command. But the company’s materials can also be found in guardrails on the Washington State highway system, as well as in that state’s ferry terminals, and according to Lomasney, the Modumetal hopes to broaden its business into the automotive and transportation sectors even further. To that end, the company recently added Rebecca Yeatman, a former GM (GM) and Ford (F) engineer, who’s helping the team develop corrosion-resistant coatings that will prolong the life of bridges, and pipelines, as well lightweight alloys to make plane and cars part lighter.

It’s a win-win if Modumetal’s expansion succeeds. For Lomasney, it means the deeper realization of her ambitious vision, but for companies and civilians, it means something else: better, safer infrastructures and services that are easier on the pocket, too.


Filed under: Brainstorm Conference, Contributors

Read More Stock Market Blogs from:

July 29 2011 | Posted in Tech Blog | Read More »